Police charge a North Kingstown man with violating five no-contact orders on the way to court.
Unless otherwise noted, information about the following incidents was supplied by the South Kingstown Police Department. An arrest does not indicate a conviction. On Way to Court, Man Charged With Five Domestic Felonies Keith W. Mongillo, 34, of 60 George Ave., North Kingstown, was arrested at about 9:25 a.m. on Oct. 31 and charged with five counts of violating a protective order. The charges were all elevated to felonies because of past offenses. According to police, they received a report from a Cranston couple that Mongillo had attempted to run them off the road, and also sworn at them. The couple told police that they and several children in the car all had no-contact orders with Mongillo. Police said a background check confirmed that …
41.46259
-71.50959
South Kingstown Public Safety Complex
1790 Kingstown Rd, Wakefield, RI
/articles/sk-police-log-october-31-2012
1412181
/locations/8101220
Police cite a South Kingstown man twice for drinking within 24 hours.
Unless otherwise noted, information about the following incidents was supplied by the South Kingstown Police Department. An arrest does not indicate a conviction. South Kingstown Man Charged With Drunken Driving, Weapons Possession; Police Also Cite Previous Night Armindo J. Medina, 60, of 624 Curtis Corner Road, South Kingstown, was arrested at about 10 p.m. on Aug. 31 and charged with drunken driving and possession of a weapon other than a firearm, and also cited for refusing to submit to a chemical test. At about 4:12 a.m., an officer noted a gold Chevrolet parked in a handicap space in their lot. The officer saw a man sleeping in the driver’s seat, and a dispatcher told police that the car had been there a while. Police woke up the …
41.46259
-71.50959
South Kingstown Public Safety Complex
1790 Kingstown Rd, Wakefield, RI
/articles/sk-police-log-august-30-and-31-2012
1412181
/locations/7761671
Ted Geisel
2:45 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012
Honestly they did him a favor the first time by only charging him with public drunkenness and not a DUI. Your car does not need to be on nor do you have to be awake to receive a DUI. Being in the drivers seat means he was in physical control of the vehicle and that would have been enough to do him in right there. If you're ever tempted to sleep it off do so outside and away from the vehicle and … more ›