.

ACLU Sues Town Over Narragansett Avenue Permits

According to a release from the ACLU, the regulations are the “latest attempt by the town to unnecessarily harass and intimidate URI students living there.”


The Rhode Island American Civil Liberties Union is suing the town of Narragansett over the interpretation of a parking ordinance for Narragansett Avenue passed in August 2011, according to a press release from the organization.

The three student plantiffs are listed as Caitlin Dowd, Grace Rignanese and Jenessa Redfern, who the ACLU said have a nine-month lease for a house on Narragansett Avenue.

According to the ACLU, the trio applied for and were issued parking permits in September. However, their cars were then ticketed in mid-October.

The ACLU says that at that point, the three were told that the parking was limited to “permanent residents,” meaning those with 12-month leases, or property owners. According to the ACLU, when the three complained to the police department, the tickets were withdrawn.

However, the three claim they were issued tickets again in January.

When they complained to the department at that time, they allege that Narragansett Police Chief Dean Hoxsie told them Town Solicitor Mark McSally had clarified that a “resident” was someone who held a 12-month lease or owned property.

In the release, Dowd is quoted as saying, “The new parking ordinance is upsetting to us because it is taking away a right, a right that everyone else on our street has. We are hurt because we have done nothing to warrant this discrimination against us. My roommates and I love this town, we love living in Narragansett and care about this community, but it is really frustrating that the town refuses to acknowledge our rights or even consider us members of the community.”

According to the press release, the ACLU takes issue with the permits being unavailable or useless to students and non-full year residents, as opposed to the legality of the limits of the parking on Narragansett Avenue.

According to the ordinance filed on ClerkBase, no distinction is made between the varying types of resident. The ordinance was approved in a special meeting on August 22, 2011, after a first reading on August 15. Minutes for both meeting have yet to be presented or approved as of April 17, 2012.

According to , Redfern was arrested on Feb. 29 and charged with drunken driving after police alleged that she hit a tree on Kingstown Road.

However, there is no record of the arrest in the online judicial database. In the majority of cases, this means the charge was either dismissed and expunged, or that Redfern pleaded to refusing to submit to a chemical test at the Rhode Island Traffic Tribunal, which leads to a dismissal of the criminal charge of driving while intoxicated.

The suit by the ACLU against the Town of Narragansett is the latest in a long line of back and forth over student rights. In January 2011, a federal appeals court earlier decisions against the ACLU and for the town regarding the sticker policy, despite from the URI Student Senate and the ACLU.

On March 5, the Narragansett Town Council approved a new ordinance to recoup emergency response costs. While no formal action has been taken yet, it is expected that the ACLU will also challenge this in court when an appropriate case occurs.

For copies of the ACLU’s press release and the ordinance approved at the August 22, 2011 meeting, see the attached PDFs.

mike westman April 17, 2012 at 09:22 PM
It seems to me that the town of Narragansett keeps trying to bite the hand that feeds them (in the winter).....not a very smart thing. Arrogant
susan Russo April 17, 2012 at 09:32 PM
If they want to be a "resident" then they should follow the same guidelines that "residents" do.... Car they have the parking permit for "must" be registered with their Narragansett address on the registration and they need to change their address on their drivers liscense with the DMV. If 12 month + residents do this along with paying local taxes, then those that want the same rights should have to follow the same rules...
Bruce Rice April 18, 2012 at 12:38 AM
I have lived in Narragansett for over 50 years, we have had students across the street for the last four years with no problems at all, this year however was a different story. The Police have been there at least five times and I am totally fed up. Whatever I can do to eliminate the students from renting near me I will go out of my way to do. I am still wokring as are several members of my family, We do not appreciate being woken up to hollering and screaming at 2 and 3 AM. It is too bad that a few have spoiled for the many fine students, but unfortunately thats what they have done.
Ted Geisel April 18, 2012 at 12:50 PM
How about signing them to a 12 month lease with a clause in it somewhere that allows either party to terminate the lease at the 9 month point for any reason without penalty?
Maribeth Gardiner April 18, 2012 at 01:58 PM
Seriously? If you can't have a parking permit unless you are a 12 month renter or owner, then it goes without saying (doesn't it?) that the same set of guidelines applies for the summer rental parking and also 'summer' rental beach passes. Sounds like Narragansett doesn't want and thinks it doesn't need the revenue it currently enjoys from the winter or summer influx of people. 'Gansett's flirting with economic disaster.....reduced revenues, reduced policing staff and other jobs, reduced business traffic, increased year-rounder property taxes, increased business tangible taxes, lower property tax collection from those second-home owners (who lose tons of property value due to lost rental income), spiraling into loss of local businesses whose sustainability is lost due to loss of the rental market traffic, meaning even more lost tax revenue to the Town, loss of the convenience of local business services, increased vandalism due to the creation of even more sheltered, secluded partying venues where now there is little population to self-police, and on and on and on.......... Let's face it, much of Narragansett's winter population are Rhode Island students, who could just as conveniently live at home, increasing their parent's economy while decreasing Narragansett's. Whatever happened to the win-win situation?
Maribeth Gardiner April 18, 2012 at 01:59 PM
Nice loophole with the 12-mo. lease suggestions
Paul Gillard April 18, 2012 at 03:14 PM
...and I would be willing to bet that the summer renters show up with a lot more disposable income than college students. Just one reason some (most) cities and towns are in the mess they are.
Spring Street April 18, 2012 at 05:37 PM
To vote u must live in town at least 6 mos.= resident.Discrimination lawsuits guaranteed get ready !But if u want a beach pass no 12 mos , now pkg permits !! Money hungry !
Maribeth Gardiner April 18, 2012 at 05:47 PM
Caution: Children At Play; let's just change the rules as we play so that the outcome is always in our favor.
Stephen Greenwell (Editor) April 18, 2012 at 05:59 PM
Per the state's website, it's actually 30 days in a town in order to be eligible to vote on the local officials and ballot questions, as long as you make that town your primary residence: http://www.elections.state.ri.us/faq/#howlong
I'm Tired of the Games April 19, 2012 at 08:02 PM
While I'm usually a strong supporter of the NPD, I think they have jumped the gun on this one. Obviously, somebody complained to them resulting in the request of a definition of "resident" from the solicitor. Since Chief Hoxsie admitted the ordinance needs revision, NPD should have waited until it was changed to begin enforcement. Not doing so gives rise to this lawsuit. The biggest issue is what is a resident? The same yardstick should be applied at the Town Beach for parking and admission, summertime and wintertime parking. What is good for one is good for all. As for the complaints of misbehaving students or renters (winter and summer) NPD needs the tools to enforce the ordinances for the good of all and continue to vigorously enfore them. Parking permits are the least of Narragansett's problems dealing with the unruly. Let's get the ordinance amended to reflect one definition of who is a resident before enforcing imaginary rules.
I'm Tired of the Games April 20, 2012 at 03:32 PM
Other than going into Executive Session Monday night 4/23 since they are being sued, there is NOTHING ON THE MEETING AGENDA to revise the ordinance as Chief Hoxsie said needed to be done. No wonder the Town is being sued!
colleen May 06, 2012 at 01:30 PM
As a property owner but not a "resident" I pay taxes to the town supporting services I don't take advantage of. At minimum tenants should be able to park cars on the streets if the "regular" residents can. There is no harm to "full time" occupants of the town. No one owns the parking spaces on the street. As for students who disturb you - call the police they have plenty of tools that they can and do use. I am a landlord the students who rent my house are not my kids so I can influence them only as a landlord. The regulations to enforce reasonable standards to preserve quiet enjoyment help me. I don't want 50 underage kids drinking beer in my house. However, the content and enforcement of those regulations is increasingly biased as this recent incident points out. Parking - what next?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something