Your Thoughts on State of the Union?
[REACT] The State of the Union address was last night – What did you think of it? Comment now!
Last night – Tuesday, Feb. 12 – marked the 2013 State of the Union, given by President Barack Obama shortly after 9 p.m. EST.
Of course, for the “just the facts, ma’am” version, you should go to America’s most trusted news source – Wikipedia. Or, depending on your political persuasion, there is CNN, FOX and NBC.
Did you watch the State of the Union address? What did you think? React in the comments section below!
Following the address, the Rhode Island Congressional delegation released these statements:
JIM LANGEVIN
Congressman Jim Langevin (RI-02), who spearheaded an effort to give people affected by gun violence a voice at the State of the Union, applauded the President’s strong stance on strengthening gun laws in his reaction to tonight’s speech. He also supported the President’s approach to boosting the economy.
“President Obama laid out the right path to creating jobs and growing our economy by supporting a strong middle class and calling for a balanced approach to managing our fiscal challenges. We cannot reach our full potential unless we give Americans a fair opportunity to succeed by investing in the elements that made our country the strongest in the world, including our education system, a strong infrastructure, and research and development.
“However, the President also recognizes that this focus on our economy does not absolve us of our obligation to make our communities, and especially our children, as safe as possible. Gun violence is an epidemic in our country and I was proud tonight that more than 30 members of Congress gave their guest ticket to someone affected by gun violence. We cannot let this moment pass without enacting responsible gun legislation. There are political obstacles, but the vast majority of Americans want us to improve gun safety. I praise the President for standing firmly behind universal background checks as well as getting assault weapons and high capacity magazines off our streets.
“For our effort to be successful, our elected officials must hear an outcry, and they must hear the stories of those who have been impacted by gun violence. These guests sitting in the gallery tonight most powerfully send the message that the status quo is unacceptable. And as the President said so eloquently tonight, they deserve a vote.”
Langevin had worked with Representatives Carolyn McCarthy (NY-4), Keith Ellison (MN-5), Rosa DeLauro (CT-3) and David Cicilline (RI-1) to ask their colleagues to give their one ticket to the President’s speech to someone affected by a gun tragedy. Thirty three offices participated, and many of their guests had an opportunity to speak out earlier in the day.
JACK REED
Following President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address, U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) stated:
“The President touched upon many important points this evening in his State of the Union Address, but the most important issue is jobs and growing our economy – particularly for Rhode Islanders. The President talked about how we have to invest in the skills of our people. How we have to invest in infrastructure. If we do that then we’ll also be able to unleash a huge amount of private capital that is frankly sitting on the sidelines. Together with investment by the government, but most importantly with private investment, we can move forward, create jobs, and build a strong economy.
For audio, click here.
SHELDON WHITEHOUSE
U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) released the statement below following President Obama’s State of the Union address:
“Tonight President Obama laid out a positive agenda for job growth and a strong middle class, and also reiterated his commitment to combating the effects of climate change – an issue which hits home for Rhode Island in the form of stronger storms, higher seas, and polluted air. I’ve been frustrated by the barricade of special interests blocking action on climate change in Washington, but the President sent a clear message tonight that he will continue to fight with us to get something done.
“The President also urged investment in infrastructure, manufacturing, and clean energy – all of which would create badly needed jobs for middle-class Rhode Islanders. I have strongly supported these proposals, and I look forward to working with President Obama to advance them in the weeks and months ahead.
“I was also pleased to hear the President use this occasion to announce a new executive order to enhance the cybersecurity of our nation’s critical infrastructure. Congress now must build on this order, filling in any gaps that require legislation. As the President explained, we face substantial cyber threats to our national and economic security, as well as our privacy. I look forward to working with Congressman Langevin, who has been a strong leader on this issue, to ensure that public-private partnerships are developed to respond to these threats, and that relevant government agencies have the capabilities, resources, and authorities necessary to protect our nation.
“Finally, the President made a strong case for protecting middle class values in our ongoing debate about the debt and deficit. There is no reason to cut programs for seniors and the middle class when wealthy corporations and individuals are getting huge tax giveaways. I hope he will continue to stand strong on that basic principle.”
Senator Whitehouse’s guest to this year’s address was Grover Fugate, Executive Director of the Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council (CRMC), and a local expert on the effects of a changing climate on the state’s coastal communities and resources.
Govstench
7:02 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
An hours worth of hot air from an Ideologue. More big government, more "investments" which is the pols word for spending. He did not address the mounting deficit. He is the modern day "pied piper" who will lead us on the road to ruin. The Dems say we don't have a spending problem. I challenge them and this President to show us the plan to reduce the deficit. They have none.
albert dussault
8:17 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Mr. Speaker: Your attitude was registered before a nation watching. You revealed your bitterness. We the Speaker of the House can not stand to applaud the efforts
of a 102 year old woman who stood in line to vote for five house....I would say you have lost perspective on the heart of the matter. You looked the part of a sore loser, and revealed to the nation what a loser you and your party are...
So turn your attention to what the conservatives do best--find a way to dismantle everything, forgetting the people.
Ted Geisel
10:20 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Huh? Are you referring to the written statement that Speaker of the House John Boehner released after Obama's speech or did you somehow confuse Marco Rubio for Speaker of the House?
mike westman
8:54 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
To all those who paint the deficit as being the fatal cancer.....it is not. The lack of an income producing middle class is. Since the right has no ability to countermand their corporate shucksters...then all they can rail about is the deficit. Their priorities are skewed and akin to a buggy maker trying to prohibit the automobile. A healthy economy will make the dollars we owe now less problematic and much easier to treat. But the right.....no message....no solutions....no nothin.
Chace Loomis
5:57 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
wow...amazing how the lefty moonbats can re-position a runaway spending problem...tell me, how does one achieve a healthy middle class?...by job creation, that's how, no short cuts...80% of this nation is small business under 20 employees; but the left sees all biz as huge corporations making billions...again the lack of economic awareness is astounding...as long as it sounds good....right?
Good Year
10:12 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Tax and Spend. Tax more spend more. Tax and Spend. Tax more spend moreTax and Spend. Tax more spend moreTax and Spend. Tax more spend moreTax and Spend. Tax more spend moreTax and Spend. Tax more spend moreTax and Spend. Tax more spend moreTax and Spend. Tax more spend more!
mike westman
10:31 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
I think you got stuck somewhere in 1976.......roads need surfacing...bridges need bridging....are we gonna just pick up shovels and make some cement and jack those ole bridgies up ourselfs. Yep...just being self reliant and who needs the gov? This is 2013 and we have expensive lives. Get over the tax thing and see that if you want to have the military defending you, the roads and such all working...and the food safe ...and the banks sort of under control....then it costs. It is now...not 1816
Chace Loomis
5:59 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
yup.....
mike westman
10:33 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
By the way....if it seems that it is just too much....poor little you....ask you reps. to go after the corps and churches and other biggies that get a tax pass.....
Chace Loomis
6:01 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
still waiting to see something...hell anything, the government does better than private business....the most inefficient spending machine the globe has ever seen...this prez wants a France-like socialist system and will achieve that goal shortly.....
mike westman
8:27 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
It would be prudent to weed out the inefficiency in govt....we all agree with that. Govt. provides a function that cannot be dealt with using a corporate or business mentality and accounting. It has to be ready.....just like the Fire Dept. or Police.....there is a constant readiness and if you ran it like a business...you would add as you need them and let them go when you do not.....an emergency? Well just add up the probability and loss/cost ratio and well.....how much does a life actually cost? No one....no one wants a socialist (you guys have no clue what that means) system but govt. is a prime element in any society. Putting it on sleep will result in a huge mess.....not this moment....but any moment. Do you want that?
Good Year
2:55 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
I have no problem at all paying taxes to pay for roads, the military, and basic services. If we were just paying for those things each citizen would have a reasonable tax burden. However, we also have to pay for a huge government bureaucracy with healthcare and pensions for everyone and their uncle. Countless programs that are ineffective, those who chose not to work, disability fraud and the list goes on and on. We should pay for services that we use and we as citizens are obligated to take care of those who can't take care of themselves. (period)!
mike westman
6:16 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
You have such a self centered and myopic view of the world......I guess your type will have to create your own state and not rule yourselves. I suggest paying off Putin and getting a huge reserve in Siberia. Cold but no one will fk with you
Chace Loomis
6:02 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Outstanding post...the truth hurts for sure..I've worked both in private and the public sector; not even close to effective, cost efficient outcomes; which as you state would ease the burden on all taxpayers....of course the left doesn't like this; they need help and will create crisis to get their skittles for life....
mike westman
8:33 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
Poor Chase....I too have worked public, private and own my own business. Seen it all...simple ....waste and corruption is in public private and since I answer my own standards...probably my own. It is inherently human. Keep it under control....try to totally weed it out....you end up a pariah and you become an outcast....as the right is finally figuring that out.....marginalized in the important areas of the US.
Ted Geisel
10:05 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
Marginalized as in having a majority in the House of Representatives or marginalized as in the majority of Governors in the US? Since 1980 which party has held the Presidency for the most years? RI isn't the US. Surely in RI the right is marginalized but calling people myopic and then making statements like that doesn't make much sense.
Good Year
8:10 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Funny how a liberal democrat brings up Putin. Deep down inside your subconscious yearns for communism comrad. Don't worry, your leader was re-elected and we're slowly heading in that direction.
mike westman
8:25 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013
you can do better....Putin is a criminal and buyable